Digitization of Administrative Procedure and the Constitutional Principle of Efficiency: Construction and Validation of the Legal Model of Digital Administrative Efficiency (MJEAD)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70577/jvpmj693

Keywords:

digital public administration; electronic administrative procedure; constitutional principle of effectiveness; digital transformation; electronic records; document management; Administrative Law.

Abstract

The digital transformation of public administration has promoted the implementation of electronic administrative procedures; however, it remains unclear whether digitalization alone is sufficient to ensure compliance with the constitutional principle of effectiveness. This study aims to analyze, from a legal-empirical perspective, the extent to which the digitalization of administrative procedures contributes to the realization of the constitutional principle of effectiveness established in Article 227 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. The research identifies the legal mechanisms underlying this contribution through a case study of the Document Management System of the Technical University of Machala (UTMACH). A mixed-methods approach with a predominately qualitative legal analysis was employed, combining doctrinal examination of constitutional, statutory, regulatory, doctrinal, and case-law sources with empirical evidence collected through a questionnaire administered to 77 administrative staff members. The study proposes the Legal Model for Digital Administrative Effectiveness (MJEAD), composed of seven interrelated elements: electronic records, electronic signatures, document traceability, access to information, document preservation, interoperability, and institutional training. The findings demonstrate that administrative effectiveness is not an automatic consequence of digital technologies but rather depends on a legal framework capable of ensuring authenticity, integrity, transparency, continuity, and legal certainty throughout electronic administrative procedures. The study concludes that the MJEAD provides an analytical framework for assessing the legal contribution of digitalization to the constitutional principle of effectiveness within public institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Begany, G. M., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2024). Open government data initiatives as agents of digital transformation in the public sector: Exploring the extent of use among early adopters. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), Article 101955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101955

Buyannemekh, B., Picazo-Vela, S., Luna, D. E., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2024). Understanding value of digital service delivery by governments in Mexico. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101936

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Crusoe, J., Magnusson, J., & Eklund, J. (2024). Digital transformation decoupling: The impact of willful ignorance on public sector digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101958

Distel, B., & Lindgren, I. (2023). A matter of perspective: Conceptualizing the role of citizens in e-government based on value positions. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101837

Gascó-Hernández, M., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2022). Unpacking the role of technology, leadership, governance and collaborative capacities in inter-agency collaborations. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101710

Guenduez, A. A., Demircioglu, M. A., Mueller, E. M., & Cinar, E. (2025). Digital innovation strategies in the public sector. Research Policy, 54(8), 105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274

Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917

Irani, Z., Abril, R. M., Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2023). The impact of legacy systems on digital transformation in European public administration: Lesson learned from a multi case analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101784

Kalogirou, V., Stasis, A., & Charalabidis, Y. (2022). Assessing and improving the National Interoperability Frameworks of European Union Member States: The case of Greece. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101716

Lee, J.-Y., Kim, B., & Yoon, S.-H. (2024). A conceptual digital policy framework via mixed-methods approach: Navigating public value for value-driven digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101961

Luna, D. E., Picazo-Vela, S., Buyannemekh, B., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2024). Creating public value through digital service delivery from a citizen’s perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101928

Margariti, V., Stamati, T., Anagnostopoulos, D., Nikolaidou, M., & Papastilianou, A. (2022). A holistic model for assessing organizational interoperability in public administration. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101712

Moser-Plautz, B., & Schmidthuber, L. (2023). Digital government transformation as an organizational response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101815

Norling, K. (2025). Digital transformation or digital standstill? Status quo bias in Swedish public sector strategies. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 19(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-04-2024-0078

Panayiotou, N. A., & Stavrou, V. P. (2021). Government to business e-services: A systematic literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101576

Rodríguez-Arana Muñoz, J. (2023). Nuevas tecnologías y buena Administración Pública. International Journal of Digital Law, 3(3). 101-120. https://doi.org/10.47975/digital.law.vol.3.n.3.munoz

Rodríguez-Arana Muñoz, J. (2023). Nuevas tecnologías, Derecho Administrativo y dignidad de las personas. International Journal of Digital Law, 4(3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.47975/digital.law.vol.4.n.3.munoz

Rukanova, B., van Engelenburg, S., Ubacht, J., Tan, Y.-H., Geurts, M., Sies, M., Molenhuis, M., Slegt, M., & van Dijk, D. (2023). Public value creation through voluntary business to government information sharing enabled by digital infrastructure innovations: A framework for analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), 101786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101786

Schmeling, J., al Dakruni, S., & Mergel, I. (2025). Data collaboration in digital government research: A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 42(3), 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102063

Schmitz, A., & Wimmer, M. A. (2023). Framework for interoperable service architecture development. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101869

Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356

van Roekel, H., Branderhorst, M., Tummers, L., & Meijer, A. (2025). Digital transformation leadership: A public value-centered measurement scale. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4), 102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102091

Weigl, L., Roth, T., Amard, A., & Zavolokina, L. (2024). When public values and user-centricity in e-government collide: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101956

Wilson, C., & Mergel, I. (2022). Overcoming barriers to digital government: Mapping the strategies of digital champions. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681

Yang, C., Gu, M., & Albitar, K. (2024). Government in the digital age: Exploring the impact of digital transformation on governmental efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, 123722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123722

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25

How to Cite

Digitization of Administrative Procedure and the Constitutional Principle of Efficiency: Construction and Validation of the Legal Model of Digital Administrative Efficiency (MJEAD). (2026). Visión Académica, 4(3), 839-852. https://doi.org/10.70577/jvpmj693

Similar Articles

1-10 of 95

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.